If you've read the recent studies published by the propaganda machine that we call our "free press" in which they talk about droughts in the near future drying up Lake Mead and Lake Powell, don't let these guys get you too worried. If they're correct, it's just dumb luck and not valid science - odds are that they're 100% wrong. I've studied their global climate models and they're not even accurate enough to "predict" the past, which means to use their models to duplicate past climate conditions that were measured, never mind predict the future. They totally missed predicting this past winter (2007-08) which was the coldest on recent record. This huge disconnect with reality comes from the fact that they don't even attempt to model such things as mountains, sea coasts, or even water vapor (which makes up 97% of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.) Besides, these models aren't even accurate on a global scale, never mind a micro-climate scale. And I know something about computer models - I've spent the last 20 years making and applying computer models to analyze and predict electrical power systems - that's what has taken me around the world for such clients as the US Government and the United Nations. So, while we should all do our part to conserve the natural resources over which we have stewardship, don't lose any sleep over these predictions or any other climate predictions based on global climate models, at least until the day when they figure out how to model how weather works.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment